Chris Bowditch wrote: > thanks for taking the time to explain, I had a quick look at the code and > have a basic understanding of what you've done. That change gets you one > step closer to decoupling layout from the FO Tree. I'm interested in what > the next step in the effort to decouple layout from the FO Tree will be.
I've been letting the compiler tell me what needs to be done. I have a script that moves code not related to FO Tree to a different directory, then I compile. The compile errors tell me what needs to be done. Sometimes it is moving stuff from fo to some other location, sometimes it is vice versa. Yesterday I added an FOTreeControl interface that Document implements, which allows everything in fo to use that interface instead of Document & should eventually decouple FO Tree even from apps/control. This would allow another application to create and use the FO Tree stuff. That work isn't complete yet. Right now I am trying to get area tree stuff in the extensions package moved to layoutmgr and/or area. To get that step done I think I'll have to start into actually using LayoutStrategy. Victor Mote --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
