> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I added in a new Batik extension element mapping in
> our main trunk code--this should help you.  It is not

Glen,

I'm just being curious: did my remarks turn out to be helpful here? (I just
want to check to what extent I'm beginning to understand the internals of
the application...)

>
> Please test it out--wait 6 hours for a nightly
> snapshot to appear (see our Download link on the main

Have done so. Well, not the Batik extension element mapping in particular,
but I had been embedding the maintenance version up to now. Switched it to
1.0dev and basic functionality seems to be A-OK.
I've run into a few cases though where the maintenance version did its work
just fine, but 1.0dev seems to be 'unfinished' - as mostly happens with
nightly builds, I guess.
I'm not sure which of these problems are already being worked on, and as I
most certainly do not want to end up 'spamming' fop-dev with a bunch of
pseudo-bugs, I'll just name a few here. If there's little insects crawling
around in here you think I'd better report to Bugzilla, just let me know :

1. links ( internal & external ) don't work: neither in my own documents,
nor in the newlinktest.fo example that comes with FOP
2. background-color [? this might be working fine: I defined a bg-c for a
table-body - now seems to disappear; works if I add them to table-cell
instead of table-body - so could be that it now actually is working
correctly by 'covering' the background of body with that of the cell... I
still need to check the spec & run a few tests to see whether this behaviour
is compliant: CSS seems to silently presuppose that if no bg-c is explicitly
defined, table-cell would inherit the value of its parent - in this case
table-row, but as none was specified there either, one would expect it to be
the color of table-body... ]
3. break-before & -after seem to have no effect


Read you later.

Greetz,


Andreas

Reply via email to