Good thing I asked--I may need to do that with the
Constants interface, where the ordering is currently


--- "Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's in the ordering of the properties.  There is a
> simply for loop to 
> process properties (attributes, in fact) defined on
> an FO.  The order of 
> definition ensures the correct order of evaluation -
> shorthand first, 
> then any individual properties.  The same goes for
> corresponding 
> properties, when I get around to doing them.  Check
> the order of 
> properties in
> Peter
> -- 
> Peter B. West
> <>

Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.

Reply via email to