--- Victor Mote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The previous posting seems to indicate that the > properties have been > decomposed, the chronologically latter posting seems > to indicate that the > shorthand retains its shorthand character.
I think Peter and I were talking about inner-to-FO properties resolution, not FO-to-Area or -layout. > The > critical thing here is that > the API not even allow anybody to ask about > shorthand or compound > properties. The API should allow requests only for > the decomposed > properties, and the FO Tree should resolve all of > this before passing a > value back. > Yes, for FO--> onwards. Glen __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/
