--- Victor Mote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The previous posting seems to indicate that the
> properties have been
> decomposed, the chronologically latter posting seems
> to indicate that the
> shorthand retains its shorthand character.
I think Peter and I were talking about inner-to-FO
properties resolution, not FO-to-Area or -layout.
> critical thing here is that
> the API not even allow anybody to ask about
> shorthand or compound
> properties. The API should allow requests only for
> the decomposed
> properties, and the FO Tree should resolve all of
> this before passing a
> value back.
Yes, for FO--> onwards.
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.