--- Victor Mote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, if possible, please let me know what you > decide. I am evaluating > in-progress projects right now to determine which > ones I should finish and > which ones I should abandon as I exit the project.
You've mentioned before, I believe, there was some things you wished to do to improve the fonts. That may be good--because most of us have not researched them. > If LayoutStrategy > survives reasonably intact, I am much inclined to > try to complete the port > of the pioneer LS. I'd rather you not. I don't want to have to maintain the 0.20.x layout strategy in addition to the 1.0 strategy in 1.0. The committers and contributors (Simon and Chris, in particular) are happy working on the improving 1.0 layout and wish to remain with it. Recent patches (hyphenation, borders) to 1.0 LS have made 0.20.x even more behind. Also, the 1.0 Area Tree and Renderers are incompatible with 0.20.x LS, I don't want their architectures changed in order to accomodate it. Those who wish to use the 0.20.x layout strategy can continue to run 0.20.x. Let the decision to bring in that LS be with the ones who will have to maintain it. As for me, getting one LS right is more than enough work. Glen __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/