Peter B. West said: > Clay, Glen, et al, > > I'm thinking of moving FAD development to SourceForge. My differences > in approach are much more significant than Victor's, so much so that I > have nothing to contribute to the discussions about details of > implementation in HEAD. Like Victor, I retain an interest in seeing my > ideas incorporated into FOP, and it seems that Victor's move may have > opened much clearer channels of communication, without muddying the > waters day-to-day. > > Jeremias' ideas about factoring out useful stand-alone elements from the > combination of FOP and Batik are essential to the direction I am taking > with layout and rendering, aside from being a Good Thing in their own > right. That interest motivated my nomination for the PMC, but disguised > the underlying differences concerning FOP. However, the primary > business of the XML Graphics PMC, for the immediate future, will be the > development of HEAD in FOP, and while I am thinking about moving, it > doesn't seem to me to be appropriate to be on the PMC. > > Peter > > Clay Leeds wrote: >> Glen is not alone in his expression of that sentiment. I too think that >> was an unfortunate decision, and I suspect that others share it as well. >> Perhaps it *might* help me and others understand why you've made this >> decision (then again, it might not--we might still think it's an >> unfortunate decision... ;-)). > -- > Peter B. West <http://cv.pbw.id.au/>
Advertising
Thanks for taking the time to make this clearer. I guess I would have to say It Makes Absolutely Some Sense Whatsoever(tm). Just the same, I certainly hope to hear your eloquent, knowledgeable voice chime into the discussions. Web Maestro Clay -- Clay Leeds - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc
