Glen Mazza wrote:
--- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Why are you so keen on removing stuff? I'd be more
concerned about
adding the stuff that's missing for an initial

Just cleaning up for the next release.

Jimi works fine
for some people. No reason to remove this.

OK, so it does work for the Java 2 platform.  We'll
keep it then.

I haven't been following the developments very closely, so this may sound like a stupid question: does that mean that FOP HEAD now works nicely with PNGs without JIMI? Has the code from Batik been merged in, or has another solution emerged?

dalibor topic

Reply via email to