--- Glen Mazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This IMO is the fatal flaw in your logic in your > previous email. You determined fo:s-p-m and fo:r-b > to > be type (1) FO's, and hence used the wrong equations > in 5.3.2 to determine calculated values for them. > They are type (3) FO's, and hence the first two > equations can never be relevant for them. >

Oops! The second equation set in 5.3.2 *can* be relevant for an FO that does not generate areas. It is not applicable for the fo:region-body in Luca's example, however, because "margin-xxxx" was not explicitly specified on it. Hence, we are left with the third equation set. Glen