On 26.08.2005 15:00:46 Victor Mote wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > > I believe that font-stretch has to included just like > > font-weight to select the actual font. > > Sorry to be unclear. I understand that font-stretch must be included. The > issue is whether the "wider" and "narrower" constraints can be processed in > the FOTree by simply bumping the description up / down, or whether (as seems > to be the case for font-weight) they must be resolved in the font system by > looking at the actual fonts available. I originally read the spec to mean > the latter,
Me, too. > but I think Manuel reads the spec as the former. I am not sure > which is right. If the latter is correct, then we will need to do something > similar to what I have described for font-weight to handle the font-stretch > relative values. <snip/> Jeremias Maerki
