On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 06:22 am, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > On Nov 3, 2005, at 08:53, Manuel Mall wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 06:03 am, J.Pietschmann wrote: > > > But I am not sure if this can be done in > > all cases. Otherwise we may have to modify the UNICODE line > > breaking algorithm to cater for the XSL-FO white space > > specialities. > > Hm. Same as Joerg, I also see these two operate at different levels. > Don't know if I'm seeing this correctly, but the line breaking > algorithm operates at the level where we have to decide the value of > the penalties for breaking before or after a particular type of > whitespace (or non-whitespace), whereas the white-space treatment > refers to line-building, so what happens/has to happen in case the > break is 'elected'. > Andreas, Joerg, I don't think we actually disagree on anything here really. We are probably falling into the 'e-mail communications hole' where we talk about the same thing just using slightly different words / descriptions and in the end going in circles. I am convinced if we sat around the table we sort this out in a few minutes and could then go on to more fundamental issues like: German beer is really superior to Belgium brews and of course prove that fact by extensive testing -:).
> Cheers, > > Andreas Cheers Manuel
