thank you for your helpfull feedback
>------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-03 22:23 ------- >Gerhard, > >Thanks for the patch. It looks fine. > >I am not quite happy with the fact that checkForcePageCount is called >by the next page sequence. This is an interaction between page >sequences, and it is better dealt with by the controlling structure, >in this case AreaTreeHandler. In other words, I go with your >suggestion in the second *. I had better orderd the open questions - so think them numbered: - 1) - 2) * 2a) * 2b) * 2c) ad 1) If there is no precedence for one of the choices i will change previousPageSeqLM from public to private as proposed in the question. ad 2) I think it is the second "-" what you call the second "*" ? Because i couldn't think it a good idea to preserve the PageSequenceLayoutManger at layoutmanger level and call it from area level, so i think i shall do the changes 2a, 2b and 2c alltogether. 2c is a must anyway. >I also note that the object that is passed to checkForcePageCount can >be narrowed down to Numeric nextPageSeq.getInitialPageNumber(). yes >There is a little error in the last page sequence but one in your demo >file. It says that next is auto-even, which is not true. yes If of any importance i can add a corrected fo to show the possibility of missing pagenumbers in case of force-page-count="no-force". Let me know. thanks gerhard -- .''`. gerhard oettl on Debian/Gnu Linux : :' : `. `'` gpg key: 1024D/D59131AA 2002-06-18 `-
