On Feb 1, 2006, at 19:50, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
...
I'll see if I get to debugging this further. Stay tuned.
No real debugging done yet. I just commented out the mentioned
conditional in TextLM, so eventual remaining spaces are always
mapped to the no-BAP element list. The result is identical, so ...
back to square one.
Alright! The space has finally disappeared, but...
I still end up with the same failing testcase: inline_border_padding.xml
If you look at the sixth block, somehow an ipd of 118.83pt is
expected, but I currently get an ipd of 113.27pt. Can anyone explain
where the expected value comes from? If I look at the resulting area
tree, then I'm under the impression that the output is A-OK... Am I
missing something?
May it be altered to 113.27pt? (= *my* expectation :-))
Anyway, I'm reluctant to commit until this one final riddle is solved.
Cheers,
Andreas
