DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39560>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39560





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-03 01:17 -------
OK, yet another one of my gut feelings at the time has hereby been proven 
correct: putting that stuff in 
addChildNode() wasn't such a good idea... Sorry :/

Now as for the solution: I'm thinking along the lines of moving the related 
code from i.e. 
TableRow.addChildNode() to TableCell.endOfNode(), since the latter is 
guaranteed to occur only once per 
actual table-cell --regardless of whether it gets cloned afterwards due to 
marker-retrieval. The same info 
will be available, only through the parent instead of directly.

Shouldn't prove to be too difficult, but before I begin:
Does anyone disagree with the change described above?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to