DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39560>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39560 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-03 01:17 ------- OK, yet another one of my gut feelings at the time has hereby been proven correct: putting that stuff in addChildNode() wasn't such a good idea... Sorry :/ Now as for the solution: I'm thinking along the lines of moving the related code from i.e. TableRow.addChildNode() to TableCell.endOfNode(), since the latter is guaranteed to occur only once per actual table-cell --regardless of whether it gets cloned afterwards due to marker-retrieval. The same info will be available, only through the parent instead of directly. Shouldn't prove to be too difficult, but before I begin: Does anyone disagree with the change described above? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
