Thanks everyone. I know now which way to go.

On 11.07.2006 20:14:59 Finn Bock wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > One of my clients reported to me that he gets a "Should be first" error
> > message on the log. This happens in (Page)BreakingAlgorithm.removeNode().
> > I get the impression that the code there is not finished rather than
> > that is a real error condition.
> Correct. In BreakingAlgorithm, at least, I simply didn't bother to 
> implement the out-of-order removing because I thought it wouldn't happen.
> Adding conditions and flags, such as found in PageBreakingAlgorithm 
> seems unnecessary to me.
> Just unconditionally remove the node in the single-linked list.
> regards,
> finn

Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to