DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41514>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41514





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-14 06:28 -------
(In reply to comment #31)
> Created an attachment (id=19578)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19578&action=view) 
[edit]
> main patch file

Patch finally applied, with some modifications (rev. 507539). Thanks Adrian!

I removed the test "if (!dir.exists())" in FopFactory.getBaseURLfromConfig
because it doesn't work when the property is a URL. Perhaps you didn't know, but
this is actually possible, for user-friendliness, to specify base and font-base
either as URLs or as directory paths. The purpose of this method is to convert a
path into a URL if necessary.
If the given value actually is a path and does correspond to an existing
directory, everything's fine. Otherwise, we assume that this is a URL whose
resolution will be attempted later on, and possibly fail.

The patch is still useful and fixes bug #40120. Bug #40288 keeps open, because
the full URL isn't displayed in the error message yet. If you wish you're
welcome to continue your work on validation. For example you may want to add
testcases with URLs instead of paths as parameters for base and font-base.

Thanks,
Vincent


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to