DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-12 02:10 -------
(In reply to comment #23)
> Adrian, thanks for doing this! I've looked at the patch and have a few
> - I'd suggest to rename "strict-configuration" to "validate-configuration"
> a personal preference).
The configuration will still be validated regardless of the setting of this
variable. Its just how the error is handled that makes the difference. If
"strict-configuration" is true then FOP will immediately throw an exception and
processing will terminate. If "strict-configuration" is set to false then FOP
will log the error and attempt to continue parsing the configuration (if
> - the name of the variable "strictFO" in FopFactory.configure(Configuration)
> seems wrong. There's nothing "FO" specific there. Furthermore, some "if
> (strictFO)" should actually be "if (strictConfig)", right?
I think you may have been looking at an older patch. The variable
"strictValidation" is as before and the new variable is called
> Adrian, would you please install the CheckStyle plug-in in your IDE? There
> are a
> few nits about the Java style in your patch. Checkstyle will help you find
> Get well quickly, Adrian!
After a weekend in bed am feeling much better today thanks. I had installed
checksytle but not enabled it! ;-( I will recreate the patch this morning.
All the best,
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.