I suppose when the spec is unclear common sense should prevail. So no
disagreements.
Adrian.
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hmm, I don't find anything in XSL 1.1 or CSS 2 that would be clear
enough for either solution. So I can't say it's either left or right,
but my personal preference would be the left solution. Shrug.
On 29.06.2007 11:04:13 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Guys,
I believe there's a bug in the handling of table- and row-backgrounds.
See the following fo snippet:
<fo:table width="100%"
table-layout="fixed"
border-collapse="separate"
border-separation="8pt"
background-color="blue"
border="4pt solid black">
<fo:table-column number-columns-repeated="2"
column-width="proportional-column-width(1)"/>
<fo:table-body>
<fo:table-row background-color="yellow">
<fo:table-cell border="4pt solid red" number-rows-spanned="2">
<fo:block>Cell 1.1</fo:block>
<fo:block>Cell 1.1</fo:block>
<fo:block>Cell 1.1</fo:block>
<fo:block>Cell 1.1</fo:block>
<fo:block>Cell 1.1</fo:block>
</fo:table-cell>
<fo:table-cell border="4pt solid red">
<fo:block>Cell 1.2</fo:block>
<fo:block>Cell 1.2</fo:block>
</fo:table-cell>
</fo:table-row>
<fo:table-row background-color="green">
<fo:table-cell border="4pt solid red">
<fo:block>Cell 2.1</fo:block>
</fo:table-cell>
</fo:table-row>
</fo:table-body>
</fo:table>
The result we get is on the left on the attached picture. I believe the
correct one should be the drawing on the right, because the area
corresponding to the border-separation should be painted with the
background of the table, not of the rows (see ยง6.7.3 of XSL-FO 1.1).
That's what Firefox is doing.
Any disagreements?
Vincent
Jeremias Maerki
