I suppose when the spec is unclear common sense should prevail. So no disagreements.

Adrian.

Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hmm, I don't find anything in XSL 1.1 or CSS 2 that would be clear
enough for either solution. So I can't say it's either left or right,
but my personal preference would be the left solution. Shrug.

On 29.06.2007 11:04:13 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Guys,

I believe there's a bug in the handling of table- and row-backgrounds.
See the following fo snippet:
<fo:table width="100%"
  table-layout="fixed"
  border-collapse="separate"
  border-separation="8pt"
  background-color="blue"
  border="4pt solid black">
  <fo:table-column number-columns-repeated="2"
    column-width="proportional-column-width(1)"/>
  <fo:table-body>
    <fo:table-row background-color="yellow">
      <fo:table-cell border="4pt solid red" number-rows-spanned="2">
        <fo:block>Cell 1.1</fo:block>
        <fo:block>Cell 1.1</fo:block>
        <fo:block>Cell 1.1</fo:block>
        <fo:block>Cell 1.1</fo:block>
        <fo:block>Cell 1.1</fo:block>
      </fo:table-cell>
      <fo:table-cell border="4pt solid red">
        <fo:block>Cell 1.2</fo:block>
        <fo:block>Cell 1.2</fo:block>
      </fo:table-cell>
    </fo:table-row>
    <fo:table-row background-color="green">
      <fo:table-cell border="4pt solid red">
        <fo:block>Cell 2.1</fo:block>
      </fo:table-cell>
    </fo:table-row>
  </fo:table-body>
</fo:table>

The result we get is on the left on the attached picture. I believe the
correct one should be the drawing on the right, because the area
corresponding to the border-separation should be painted with the
background of the table, not of the rows (see ยง6.7.3 of XSL-FO 1.1).
That's what Firefox is doing.

Any disagreements?
Vincent




Jeremias Maerki



Reply via email to