Andreas L Delmelle writes: > Been reading up a bit on concurrency and synchronization and the > likes, and I'm in the meantime quite convinced that the strategy > should indeed be altered to move away from static final Maps. Don't > know if Richard is still listening in and has any opinions/ideas?
I'm listening again. Been very busy for the last few weeks - moving etc. I've missed most of the recent conversations so if there is anything important, relevant and not covered on the 41044 messages please let me know. Back to the concurrency, I'm not sure entirely why this is an major issue. As I understand it the generation of a single fop document is mostly linear - i.e. single threaded. Assuming we're dealing with the case of multiple documents simultaneously (e.g. in a webapp), does anyone have usable numbers on the number of possible threads? > I've been playing with trying to make the cache thread-local If in doubt, you could always make the caching multi-level. L1 is the current global cache. L2 is a thread-local equivalent of the same - all pointing to the same properties (if required) but with different access keys. The L2 cache in this case need have no contention at all, Richard
