On Friday 03 August 2007 07:01, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2007, at 10:06, Manuel Mall wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 August 2007 15:45,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > What am I missing?
>
> You are not missing anything, AFAICT except that:
> ... FOP still aims for 1.4 compliance
> ... java.util.concurrent and like classes have not been implemented
> under 1.4 yet...
>

Andreas, you didn't quite answer my question. Why do we need a shared 
property cache and therefore synchronisation, etc.? Why can't we have a 
simple cache per FOP rendering run?

>
> Cheers
>
> Andreas

Manuel

Reply via email to