Adrian, would you mind if I renamed AbstractData to AbstractStateData (if it has to be a top-level class) and moved it together with AbstractState and StateStack to org.apache.fop.util or org.apache.fop.util.state? I don't like those classes to be in the top-level FOP package. I'm also not sure if "AbstractState" is speaking enough after it's moved out of the "rendering" or "output generation" context. I'm thinking about renaming that to "AbstractRenderingState".
On 31.10.2008 11:58:46 acumiskey wrote: > Author: acumiskey > Date: Fri Oct 31 02:58:46 2008 > New Revision: 709373 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=709373&view=rev > Log: > Fix for > test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/block-container_absolute-position_fixed.xml. > > Added: > > xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_AFPGOCAResources/src/java/org/apache/fop/AbstractData.java > (with props) > > xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_AFPGOCAResources/src/java/org/apache/fop/AbstractState.java > - copied, changed from r708875, > xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_AFPGOCAResources/src/java/org/apache/fop/AbstractState.java > > xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_AFPGOCAResources/src/java/org/apache/fop/StateStack.java > (with props) > Modified: > > xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_AFPGOCAResources/src/java/org/apache/fop/afp/AFPState.java > > xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_AFPGOCAResources/src/java/org/apache/fop/pdf/PDFState.java > > xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_AFPGOCAResources/src/java/org/apache/fop/render/AbstractPathOrientedRenderer.java > > xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_AFPGOCAResources/src/java/org/apache/fop/render/afp/AFPRenderer.java > > xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_AFPGOCAResources/src/java/org/apache/fop/render/pdf/PDFRenderer.java Jeremias Maerki
