Simon Pepping wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 07:37:12PM +0000, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> Speaking of the release, many parts of the website are largely outdated
>> and need a serious re-work (the Development tab, mainly). Also, any
>> reference to 0.20.5 should IMO be removed before releasing 1.0. 0.20.5
>> is a thing of the past now.
> That makes a release even more difficult. I am in favour of an early
> release, rather than working on the website
>> Finally, the website could really do with a new look. ATM it???s looking
>> so... 1990???s. I started to work on that some time ago (based on the
>> Batik skin), but never got to finishing it. Forrest sometimes gets in
>> the way, I must say. Maybe switching to an alternative framework could
>> be investigated. Especially if it can also provide higher automation.
> Again, I am in favour of focusing on an early release as our most
> important requirement.

Then someone is going to spend 3 days doing the 1.0 release, and when
it’s time to do the next release the exact same issue will show up

Releasing 1.0 is the perfect opportunity to do some re-branding and
refactor the website, IMO.


Reply via email to