oh, sorry for the mistake, my last PDF was OK. I guess that the cause of
my initial trouble was that I patched the branch rather than the trunk.
Thank you for your help.
I'm happy to see that your patch works fine (with respect or conditions
of use ;-) ).
I have some Arabic materials to check your job (with FO source and PDF
output from other FO engines, using DejaVu font familly).
I'll be back after holidays to adapt my FOs (to use ArialUni) to make
further tests and feedbacks.
Good job, Glenn.
Le 04/08/2010 02:33, Glenn Adams a écrit :
> OK, I see from your output file that it is indeed working correctly
> for ArialUni, peforming both bidi and Arabic shaping, i.e.,
> substitution of positional variants and ligatures. Would you agree? Or
> do you think something is amiss?
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Pascal Sancho
> <pascal.san...@takoma.fr <mailto:pascal.san...@takoma.fr>> wrote:
> (1): I only play with ArialUni.ttf, since I don't have neither
> simpo.ttf nor simbdo.ttf on my system.
> Note: I've changed your XSL-FO attn to use only ArialUni.
> (2): I run WinXP 32, french version
> (3) I build and run with JDK 6.0_20.
> The unique Warning I get is for ArialUni bold unavailable (witch
> is expected).
> I've patched the trunk r981406 as indicated in your patch description.
> ArialUni.ttf v1.01
> Le 03/08/2010 15:00, Glenn Adams a écrit :
>> (1) do you have all of the following fonts on your system?
>> simpo.ttf, simbdo.ttf, arialuni.ttf?
>> (2) if so, are they new versions, e.g., from Win7?
>> (3) if so, then please send me info on the platform you are using
>> and include the output PDF file so I may verify, also send any
>> warnings/errors you receiving when running FOP, since when I run
>> the test file I include, I do not encounter any warnings/errors;
>> note also that the Temp_ComplexScripts branch does not yet
>> include the patch, which may be the cause; i have no control over
>> when the patch will be applied, as I am not a committer, so have
>> no means to update;
>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 4:49 PM, <bugzi...@apache.org
>> <mailto:bugzi...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> --- Comment #12 from Pascal Sancho <pascal.san...@takoma.fr
>> <mailto:pascal.san...@takoma.fr>> 2010-08-03 04:49:43 EDT ---
>> (In reply to comment #8)
>> Glenn, I do not get Character shaping when applying patch
>> (against either trunk
>> r981406 or Temp_ComplexScripts). The output is the same as
>> FOP 1.0 without
>> I've tested it with Arial UNI (I didn't get Simplified Arabic).
>> Configure bugmail:
>> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>> You are the assignee for the bug.