Thanks much for testing this patch and confirming its functioning. I will look forward to your future feedback.
Note that I have created a page for supported fonts<https://skynav.trac.cvsdude.com/fop/wiki/SupportedFonts>, which I will extend as I test and verify additional fonts with complex scripts. Let me know if you find that some unlisted font does actually work. Je *vous* souhaite une très *bonnes* vacances. Regards, Glenn On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Pascal Sancho <pascal.san...@takoma.fr>wrote: > Glenn, > oh, sorry for the mistake, my last PDF was OK. I guess that the cause of my > initial trouble was that I patched the branch rather than the trunk. > Thank you for your help. > I'm happy to see that your patch works fine (with respect or conditions of > use ;-) ). > I have some Arabic materials to check your job (with FO source and PDF > output from other FO engines, using DejaVu font familly). > > I'll be back after holidays to adapt my FOs (to use ArialUni) to make > further tests and feedbacks. > Good job, Glenn. > > Pascal > > > > Le 04/08/2010 02:33, Glenn Adams a écrit : > > OK, I see from your output file that it is indeed working correctly for > ArialUni, peforming both bidi and Arabic shaping, i.e., substitution of > positional variants and ligatures. Would you agree? Or do you think > something is amiss? > > G. > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Pascal Sancho <pascal.san...@takoma.fr>wrote: > >> Glenn, >> >> (1): I only play with ArialUni.ttf, since I don't have neither simpo.ttf >> nor simbdo.ttf on my system. >> Note: I've changed your XSL-FO attn to use only ArialUni. >> (2): I run WinXP 32, french version >> (3) I build and run with JDK 6.0_20. >> The unique Warning I get is for ArialUni bold unavailable (witch is >> expected). >> I've patched the trunk r981406 as indicated in your patch description. >> ArialUni.ttf v1.01 >> >> -- >> Pascal >> >> Le 03/08/2010 15:00, Glenn Adams a écrit : >> >> (1) do you have all of the following fonts on your system? simpo.ttf, >> simbdo.ttf, arialuni.ttf? >> (2) if so, are they new versions, e.g., from Win7? >> (3) if so, then please send me info on the platform you are using and >> include the output PDF file so I may verify, also send any warnings/errors >> you receiving when running FOP, since when I run the test file I include, I >> do not encounter any warnings/errors; >> >> note also that the Temp_ComplexScripts branch does not yet include the >> patch, which may be the cause; i have no control over when the patch will be >> applied, as I am not a committer, so have no means to update; >> >> G. >> >> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 4:49 PM, <bugzi...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687 >>> >>> --- Comment #12 from Pascal Sancho <pascal.san...@takoma.fr> 2010-08-03 >>> 04:49:43 EDT --- >>> (In reply to comment #8) >>> >>> Glenn, I do not get Character shaping when applying patch (against either >>> trunk >>> r981406 or Temp_ComplexScripts). The output is the same as FOP 1.0 >>> without >>> patch. >>> >>> I've tested it with Arial UNI (I didn't get Simplified Arabic). >>> -- >>> Pascal >>> >>> -- >>> Configure bugmail: >>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email >>> ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- >>> You are the assignee for the bug. >>> >> >> >> > >
