https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52477
--- Comment #3 from Mehdi Houshmand <[email protected]> 2012-01-18 07:57:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) </snip> There are 2 points to address there: 1) We can't arbitrarily make changes to FOP in order for it to "better" (not even fully!!) support the client systems, in this case ghostscript. The bug is in ghostscript, it should know if it is using a new PDF and change any prefixes accordingly. 2) We use the deterministic trait of the prefixes in our testing framework. The value of having a comprehensive test suite is far greater than making the code change for this scenario. I understand that none of the above particularly helps you, but we can't very well go changing FOP to accommodate nuanced bugs in ghostscript. Mehdi -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
