https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52477

--- Comment #3 from Mehdi Houshmand <med1...@gmail.com> 2012-01-18 07:57:11 UTC 
---
(In reply to comment #2)
</snip>

There are 2 points to address there:
1) We can't arbitrarily make changes to FOP in order for it to "better" (not
even fully!!) support the client systems, in this case ghostscript. The bug is
in ghostscript, it should know if it is using a new PDF and change any prefixes
accordingly.

2) We use the deterministic trait of the prefixes in our testing framework. The
value of having a comprehensive test suite is far greater than making the code
change for this scenario.

I understand that none of the above particularly helps you, but we can't very
well go changing FOP to accommodate nuanced bugs in ghostscript.

Mehdi

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to