On 2014-03-30 Ron Wheeler wrote: > On 30/03/2014 5:19 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > > > I personally think it would be much easier to attract developers > > to create a completely new paged media CSS engine than to add > > several niche XSL-FO features into FOP. But when mentioning the > > new engine, I don't think it is a good idea. Sooner or later > > these CSS features will be adopted by major browsers and in that > > time it won't be necessary to produce PDFs at all :-) > > The supposes that paper documentation will disappear. There are > regulatory issues, industry practices, etc. that need to change. > There will still be face to face meetings where someone wants to hand a > piece of paper to someone for the next few years.
Slightly off-topic, but a short comment... I didn't mean paper-less way, but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MHTML way, where all dependencies are embedded in a single file which you can open in a browser (it acts as PDF, but it is HTML/CSS based). Jan
