On 2014-03-26 Christopher R. Maden wrote:
> Although I don’t get a vote, I completely agree with Glenn that DITA
> integration into FOP is completely inappropriate.

+1

FOP consumes standardized XSL-FO.

DITA-OT should produce standardized XSL-FO. Period ;-)

>From my POV it has nothing to do with FOP, it is rather XSLT (or whatever) 
>part.

 
But I agree FOP could be enhanced to be more conformant to the standard. It 
requires engaging developers and sponsors. Some ideas appear in this mailing 
list from time to time.

Jan


Reply via email to