+1
________________________________
From: Glenn Adams<mailto:gl...@skynav.com>
Sent: ‎4/‎28/‎2014 3:32
To: FOP Developers<mailto:fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_WhitespaceManagement to trunk

Are those reasonable constraints?


On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Luis Bernardo <lmpmberna...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> Further testing showed that this only seems to work if:
> -- the multi-switch element is the last element with content in the page
> -- the alternatives are ordered from the largest to the smallest
> Since the constraints are not too restrictive,
>
> +1
>
>
> On 4/26/14, 11:49 PM, Luis Bernardo wrote:
>
>>
>> I tested with the attached example and the result is not what I expected.
>> It is also possible that I don't understand what best fit means.
>>
>> I was expecting yellow, yellow, yellow. Instead I get yellow, blue,
>> yellow. Can you please comment?
>>
>> On 4/24/14, 11:58 PM, Luis Bernardo wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Vincent, if you hold off tallying the votes till Monday then I will run
>>> some tests before I vote.
>>>
>>> On 4/22/14, 5:11 PM, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> as you may be aware, Seifeddine Dridi has been working for the past few
>>>> months on an extension to manage the white space available in
>>>> a document. It is based on the fo:multi-switch element and selects the
>>>> first fo:multi-case child that fits on the page. That allows to define
>>>> smaller variants in case there is not enough space left on the page.
>>>>
>>>> The approach is similar to what is described here:
>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/WhitespaceManagement
>>>>
>>>> All patches, comments and discussions are available in the following
>>>> JIRA issue:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2293
>>>>
>>>> The code is here:
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/branches/
>>>> Temp_WhitespaceManagement
>>>>
>>>> It has reached a state where we believe it is ready to be merged to
>>>> trunk.
>>>>
>>>> This vote will run until Friday, 25th April 16:00 UTC.
>>>>
>>>> +1 from me.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Vincent
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to