On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Chris Bowditch <bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Glenn,
>
> I guess you are referring to this patch you prepared;
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881
>
> I did search the archives but couldn't find the previous discussion on
> this topic.
>
> Maven is a pain to setup, but once configured it is actually easier to use
> than ant as it gives you 1 step IDE configuration which is a big bonus :-)
>
> So I'm +1 on switching, but we should do this across all projects in XML
> Graphics, not just FOP. And in my view this should be done after we've
> completed the current planned release of all projects.
>

yes


>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
> On 22/04/2015 17:35, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Luis Bernardo <lmpmberna...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:lmpmberna...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     I think that maven will be embraced as soon as there is a
>>     volunteer to do the transition.
>>
>>
>> A few years ago I went through the process of creating a full maven
>> configuration for FOP; however, the group was not ready to make the
>> transition at that time.
>>
>> I have recently converted another multiple-module internal project to
>> maven from ant, and would be able to repeat the process on fop. However, I
>> don't want to do it unless there is support to switch over.
>>
>>
>>
>>     On 4/22/15 6:13 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>
>>>     on another point, when can we transition to maven? our ant
>>>     configurations are difficult to maintain and understand; we
>>>     should modernize
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to