You can get the debugging output back by asking for DEBUG output in the
From: Savino, Matt C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:46 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Keeping it together
Supposedly in .20.3, <fo:table-row keep-with-next="always"> works. In
previous versions it went into an endless loop if the rows went beyond the
end of the page.
Has anyone used .20.3? I didn't like the the logging errors and two new jar
files I was supposed to use. And I missed my benchmarking output (the time
not the memory). I posted on fop-dev to ask if there was any way around
these issues but no one replied.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jozef Chocholacek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Keeping it together
> Lars Karschen wrote:
> > ...
> > I tried to connect them via keep-with-next.within-page="always",
> > but there's no change on the output, maybe i overlooked something,
> > since i'm not sure if i understand the definition on the W3C-Page ;)
> You understand it good, but FOP has no or just a symbolic
> implementation of this property(-ies). Keeps doesn't work in
> FOP :( It
> is the most important feature to be implemented, from my
> point of view,
> anything else works good enough for my purposes.
> Ing. Jozef Chocholacek Qbizm Technologies, Inc.
> Chief Project Analyst ... the art of internet.
> Kralovopolska 139 tel: +420 5 4124 2414
> 601 12 Brno, CZ http://www.qbizm.com fax: +420 5 4121 2696