You can get the debugging output back by asking for DEBUG output in the logging code.
Scott -----Original Message----- From: Savino, Matt C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:46 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Keeping it together Supposedly in .20.3, <fo:table-row keep-with-next="always"> works. In previous versions it went into an endless loop if the rows went beyond the end of the page. Has anyone used .20.3? I didn't like the the logging errors and two new jar files I was supposed to use. And I missed my benchmarking output (the time not the memory). I posted on fop-dev to ask if there was any way around these issues but no one replied. -Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: Jozef Chocholacek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Keeping it together > > > Lars Karschen wrote: > > ... > > I tried to connect them via keep-with-next.within-page="always", > > but there's no change on the output, maybe i overlooked something, > > since i'm not sure if i understand the definition on the W3C-Page ;) > > You understand it good, but FOP has no or just a symbolic > implementation of this property(-ies). Keeps doesn't work in > FOP :( It > is the most important feature to be implemented, from my > point of view, > anything else works good enough for my purposes. > > > Regards, > > J.Ch. > -- > Ing. Jozef Chocholacek Qbizm Technologies, Inc. > Chief Project Analyst ... the art of internet. > ________________________________________________________________ > Kralovopolska 139 tel: +420 5 4124 2414 > 601 12 Brno, CZ http://www.qbizm.com fax: +420 5 4121 2696 > >
