J: > No offense meant, but most people start with the most > inefficient ways to generate XML, usually doing a > lookup in a remote database (which is slow, but hard to > avoid), building an XML string or a DOM tree (which is > slow, memory consuming and avoidable) and then feed it > to the XSLT processor.
I meant to ask--what alternatives do you suggest to that avoidable second step as far as getting to the XSLT processor? thx a lot Matt Savino
