Cheers Glen, Are you on the FOP dev team? Is 1.0 far away? I'll look into these other implementations. You are right the XSL won't work, I was originally playing around with <page-sequence-master master-name = "contents"> but removed it as it wasn't useful, and obviously forgot to change the rest. Thanks again.
bF. -----Original Message----- From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 12 March 2004 3:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: using multiple page sequences Fleetwood, Brett (SSABSA) schrieb: >I read that using multiple page sequences in the XSL and >therefore in the FO means that fop will release some memory. > The ML archives seem to indicate that, but I'm unsure how significant the savings would be. It might not be worth the effort. I'm currently looking in this area for our newer version (1.0) and hopefully "band-aids" such as these will not be necessary in the future. >Is there any solutions I can use that uses >multiple page sequences or possible change the xml structure, if not is >there another FOP transformer that isn't as memory intensive. > RenderX and AntennaHouse are the main commercial implementations. > ><fo:layout-master-set> > <fo:simple-page-master master-name="A4" > </fo:simple-page-master> ></fo:layout-master-set> > ><fo:page-sequence master-reference="contents"> > > Hmmm...I guess I'm missing something here--doesn't the master reference ("contents") need to refer to the master-name of the simple-page-master ("A4")? Glen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
