Thx, i think i'll have to try jfor. I hope it is not to complicated to use. Perhaps someone could help me, if there are problems again :)
thx so far, Johannes. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glen Mazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 9:53 PM Subject: Re: Development Version: xml+xsl -> fo -> rtf > Many non-trivial fo files will not work on the > development version, even including several of our own > examples. It is still very much a work in progress. > We try to fix the issues as we encounter them, and > over time, more and more of them become functional. > > Glen > > --- Johannes Franz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, i created a fo file, with a preprocessor from > > xml+xsl. Now i tried: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/xml-fop> ./fop.sh protocol.fo -rtf > > bittebitte.rtf > > > > and get the following error message: > > > > 16.06.2004 18:18:54 org.apache.fop.apps.Fop main > > INFO: 1.0dev > > Exception in thread "main" > > java.lang.NullPointerException > > at > > org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.render(Driver.java:544) > > at org.apache.fop.apps.Fop.main(Fop.java:71) > > > > What did i do wrong? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Victor Mote" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 6:19 PM > > Subject: RE: Development Version: xml+xsl -> fo -> > > rtf > > > > > > > Clay Leeds wrote: > > > > > > > "RTF > > > > > > > > This is currently not integrated with FOP but it > > will soon. > > > > This will create an rtf (rich text format) > > document that will > > > > attempt to contain as much information from the > > fo document > > > > as possible." > > > > > > > > If any of the fop-devs knows more about getting > > FOP to output > > > > to RTF, it would be great to update the web site > > to make the > > > > above actually contain useful information. I > > checked CVS for > > > > > > RTF support is much more robust in the development > > branch, thanks mostly > > to > > > the jfor crew, led by Bertrand Delecretaz, and > > Peter Herweg's efforts to > > > integrate it. However, since releases are not > > being made from the > > > development branch yet, users will have to > > download and build it > > themselves, > > > at their own risk. > > > > > > > the FOP Output Target page (from whence the > > above quote was > > > > taken), but couldn't find any information on the > > subject. The > > > > RTF-related info appears to have either been > > entered into the > > > > FOP Output Targets page before it was brought > > into CVS, or it > > > > wasn't well-documented. > > > > > > The web site, of course, refers to the released > > versions, and is accurate. > > > > > > WRT the source file, I don't follow. I can see the > > content here: > > > > > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/ou > > > tput.xml?rev=1.16&only_with_tag=MAIN&view=markup > > > at line 240. > > > > > > Victor Mote > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
