Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Just wondering: is this only the case when both properties have a value of
'always'? The OP seemed to be using a (low) integer value for
'keep-with-next', so I concluded --perhaps mistakenly so-- that there was no
risk of ending up with an infinite loop... since 'keep-together' would
always have higher priority than 'keep-with-next' (?)

FOP 0.20.5 doesn't understand numerical priorities, I believe every value (including "never" :-) is interpreted as "always".

J.Pietschmann

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to