Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
(Jay's suggestion just rolled in --I'm not 100% sure, but I think FOP will complain if it encounters attributes in the fo: namespace that are not properties as defined in the Rec. FOP 0.20.5 may turn out to be forgiving... Just to be on the safe side, I'd use a separate namespace.)
Looking at the Rec to determine this, I found two possible problems with the current way that the rules are written, and have submitted them to the XSL-Editors ML for the working group to look over.[1]
Glen [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2005OctDec/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
