> Tony Morris escribió: > >> Thanks, by explicitly setting a width and height, the problem >> disappeared - it only occurred for the RTF renderer (though I only >> tried the PDF one as well). The sizes themselves seem to be a tad >> obscure though.
Tony, can you be a bit more precise as to what you mean by this last sentence? All I know is that, in FOP Trunk, with 'height' and 'width' you only specify the dimension of the area. Use them in combination with 'content-height' and 'content-width' to get appropriate results. I don't have my test case with me, since I am at work at the moment. Otherwise, what I recall is setting the size of an external-graphic to the exact number of pixels (I think if I didn't, the RTF renderer wasn't happy), the image appeared scaled down, but if I set the image size to say, 10x the number of pixels, it would not appear 10x bigger than the scaled down image, but about the size I would expect normally. Granted, I was using MS Word 2003 for verification, which may well be the culprit. I will get more exact details when I go home. Tony Morris Software Engineer IBM Software Group, Tivoli Software Gold Coast, Australia (GMT +10) Sun Certified Programmer for the Java 2 Platform 1.4 Sun Certified Programmer for the Java 2 Platform 5.0 Sun Certified Developer for the Java 2 Platform "I am an engineer. If I fail to accept what others accept, I earn their opprobrium." --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
