Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
In this respect, it may prove worthwhile to track down whether this difference is really caused by the XSLT processor itself, or merely by the fact that Saxon comes bundled with its own XML parser (AElfred).
Saxon uses a more efficient internal data storage, and also has much better optimizations, both static and run-time. I believe the more compact data representation is the winner, which also allows transformation up to ten times the size Xalan can manage. J.Pietschmann --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
