Interesting. It's caused by the "title" element under the page-sequence. If you comment it, the problem goes away. I will have to take a closer look to find out what's going on.
On 06.02.2006 12:53:30 Roberto Nunnari wrote: > Hello. > > I just gave a try at 0.91beta and I get a null pointer exception: > > E:\soft\apache\fop-0.91beta>.\fop.bat -fo offerta.xml -pdf offerta.pdf > Exception > java.lang.NullPointerException > > The very same file, can be parsed successfully with 0.20.5 > > E:\soft\apache\fop-0.20.5>.\fop.bat -fo ..\fop-0.91beta\offerta.xml -pdf > offerta.pdf > [INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser > [INFO] FOP 0.20.5 > [INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser > [INFO] building formatting object tree > [INFO] setting up fonts > [INFO] [1] > [INFO] [2] > [INFO] [3] > [INFO] Parsing of document complete, stopping renderer > > The source FO document used is available at: > http://robi.nunnari.net/offerta.xml > > Any ideas? > > Best regards. > -- > Robi > > > Roberto Nunnari wrote: > > Thank you Jeremias. > > > > I'll do some testing and if all seams right I'll try to deploy > > 0.91beta to the production environment. > > After some time of usage, I'll report the result (user satisfaction > > related to the switch from 0.20.5) of its introduction to the > > production environment. > > > > Best regards. > > -- > > Robi > > > > > > > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > > >> In my opinion, FOP 0.91beta can be used in production if you test it > >> very thouroughly for the particular documents you need it for. There are > >> still some features missing that FOP 0.91beta makes not universally > >> usable, yet. At least at the moment, it's still not a complete > >> replacement for FOP 0.20.5 althought we're very close now. > >> > >> At any rate, we'd love to hear any success stories about the latest > >> release. :-) > >> > >> On 06.02.2006 10:51:34 Roberto Nunnari wrote: > >> > >>> I was trying to align the content of a table cell on the > >>> bottom using vertical-align="bottom", but I found out that > >>> it is not supported in 0.20.5 but it is in 0.91beta, together > >>> with many other features. > >>> > >>> So, I'm thinking about moving to 0.91beta, but as I remember > >>> that some time ago I read somewhere that 0.91beta is not > >>> adviced for production environment, I'd like to ask whether > >>> now things have changed and if it is now safer to use > >>> 0.91beta in production environment. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Jeremias Maerki Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
