On 10.02.2006 20:14:06 Roberto Nunnari wrote: > Hello Jeremias. > > Yes. You're right. There was a problem with the FO document.. > in effect it was the same as the one I had a week ago caused > by the title element. > > Anyways, I managed to move from 0.20.5 to 0.91beta and have it > generate correctly the pdf. > > The only problem was with the trick I had used in 0.20.5 > with the last marker so that the last page would not have the > subtotal on the last page. The difference: > - 0.20.5: <marker marker-class-name="subtotalvalue"></marker> > - 0.91beta: <marker marker-class-name="subtotalvalue"> </marker> > > as you see, the only difference is that in 0.91beta a space > is necessary to have fop use an empty string on the last page > instead of the last non empty marker. > > Also, 0.91beta correctly renders the subtotal in bold while > 0.20.5 doesn't. > > Ok. Next week I'll deploy 0.91beta in the production environment > and if all will be well, after a couple of weeks I'll report > here.
Thanks for the feedback. > Just one more question: > I need be sure a small table will be shown all on the same page > and not split across two pages.. What is the best way to go > with 0.91beta ? Is it possible to achive that using several table-row > or should I use put all content in a single table-row? You can use multiple table-rows and keep-together.within-page="always" on the fo:table. (works only in 0.91beta and later) <snip/> Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
