Hi there, first mail from me from Germany, right now I'm quite busy. Here're some first stats:
real user sys 0m21.679s 0m3.503s 0m0.250s 0m33.323s 0m3.467s 0m0.266s 0m24.552s 0m3.468s 0m0.256s ================================ 0m23.106s 0m3.627s 0m0.263s 0m30.597s 0m3.639s 0m0.241s 0m6.114s 0m3.647s 0m0.236s First part is fop-0.20.5, second is fop-0.91.beta. Bot done on a 2GHz Athlon Gentoo Linux, Blackdown Java and approx. 300kByte FO-document. Tomorrow I'll send some better stats, even from a HP-UX multiprocessor machine, running native SUN JDK and documents > 100pages. The stats above show no difference, due to less complexity of source document, [past your favorite geek-talk here]... I use FOP for about 3 years and I'm totally excited 'bout the new release. Funny gadgets are working now, esp. page links with docbook indexterms and RTF (yes, some still worship Micros~1 tools to copy and paste tables from manuals and release notes. IE 5.0 on NT 4.0 can't do nothing wrong the right way). ----- original Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: fop beta performance Gesendet: Mo 20 Feb 2006 11:42:19 CET Von: "Jeremias Maerki"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Find out for us! :-) I did some tests a few months ago and back then the > new code was indeed a little faster. In the meantime, new features have > found their way in and the situation may look differently. Note also, > that there has been no performance optimization work in the layout > engine, yet, like it was done for 0.20.5. > > On 20.02.2006 11:31:57 Jimmy Dixon wrote: > > Is the new FOP beta any faster than the previous release? > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- original Nachricht Ende ---- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
