I looked up Chemical Markup Language (CMLTM) on Google and found.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the original site for Chemical Markup Language. Much original
archive material remains on this site, but for the latest information,
please visit any of the following: 
http://cml.sourceforge.net/ 
http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/moin/ChemicalMarkupLanguage 
and the parent site of (2) above at http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/moin/ 
The URI: www.xml-cml.org/schema/cml2/ remains the formal namespace prefix
for the CML components (although there is no need to formally resolve any
document via the transport request http://.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a fundamental mistake in Chemical Markup Language. It should have
been based on SVG.
Bob Leif

-----Original Message-----
From: David Delbecq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 6:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Chemical Markup Language

My day chasing deadlocks suddently feel better compared to this. I have
never seen a worse design of a markup language :)

The designer should be dismembered, stripped, tied up, covered with cow
blood and exposed in stonehenge to be raped by aliens. By that time
his/her computer should be burn such a disease to spread! :D


[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :

>I've just had a look at CML. What a nightmare! Take this element, for
example,
>
><CML.TAB ID="table1" NAME="NET ATOMIC CHARGES" ROWS= 12 COLUMNS=3
COL.NAMES="ELEMENT CHARGE DENSITY" COL.REFS="CML.COR.NOTATION CML.THE.CHARGE
CML.THE.AEDENSITY" COL.TYPES="STRING FLOAT FLOAT">
> C          -0.102123        4.1021
> C          -0.102108        4.1021
> C          -0.102110        4.1021
> C          -0.102118        4.1021
> C          -0.102100        4.1021
> C          -0.102098        4.1021
> H           0.102111        0.8979
> H           0.102105        0.8979
> H           0.102111        0.8979
> H           0.102115        0.8979
> H           0.102097        0.8979
> H           0.102119        0.8979
></CML.TAB>
>
>Someone should slap the designer of this monstrosity. 
>
>All that aside, I've been able to produce all kinds of output from
well-designed input using XSLT. If what you are trying to produce is CML,
what format is used in the input?
>  
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to