[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I removed them for a test.
Eventually I have succeeded to generate the PDF wih 0.91:) The reason why we
are still using 0.20.5 is that it is marked as stable and the bank has some
special policies... but maybe we can try to push 0.91 if it works with the
old FOs.
IMHO 0.91beta is of superior quality than 0.20.5. But it has had less
exposure than 0.20.x, so we must remain cautious.
There is a problem with the borders when I generate the PDF with 0.91. For
example when a cell is spanned over several columns the borders of the
colums are drawn within the cell (not only the leftmost and rightmost).
Sometimes the borders appear to be shifted to the left/right. We have used
RTF2FO 3.4.1 Prof to generate the layouts and they looked perfect with
0.20.5. Any idias on how to achiev the same view with 0.91?
The point to note about borders is that 0.20.5 implements a half baked
version of the border collapse algorithm. Note that it not entirely
compliant with the spec. 0.91beta does not yet support the
border-collapse="collapse" setting. To avoid strange effects with table
borders in 0.91 you must set border-collapse="separate" on the fo:table
element. Failing that post up a screenshot of the borders so we can see
what you mean (its not clear from your description)
<snip/>
Chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
