Hello Johannes, I read this thread and wondered if there is no other way. I don't like it to interrupt the fo-rendering, doing some stuff and then keep
on going ;) Now it turned out, that i had to create a very simple list. During studying the definition of Formating Objects for Lists [1] i asked myself if this would not be a much more 'nicer' way in creating what you want to. As the compliance-page [2] indicates, all needed objects are implemented. What do you, and what does Jeremias think about this way? Greetings, Joachim [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice6.html#section-N17076-Formatting- Objects-for-Lists [2] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-object-list- section On 20 Mar 2006 at 14:42, Johannes Künsebeck wrote: > Thank you Jeremias, that's the solution! > This "2-pass"-approach is very cool, I can't imagine designs that aren't > possible with it. > If you can't wait for XSL-FO2.0, use this as a hack for "layout-driven" > documents. > I just summarize it for the list, because I think it can be helpful in > other situations, too. > [...] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
