Jeremias, Thanks for your help!
As a follow-up, does the fact that Adobe has deprecated EPS embedding imply that one should only use SVG if vector graphics are desired for PDF output with FOP? Jim > I've recently had to fix EPS-embedding in PDF. Somehow it was broken in > FOP Trunk. > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386327&view=rev > > So, if you get the source code directory from Subversion your problem > should be fixed. Just note that Adobe has deprecated that feature > beginning with PDF 1.4. It should not be used anymore On Wednesday 29 March 2006 15:57, Jim Guerin wrote: > Hi, > > I've searched and Googled and tried many iterations of setting parameters > but I just can't seem to find the answer to this one. > > I'm currently using 0.91 beta to output to PDF. When I open the PDF file > all of images are missing. I'm using EPS as sources for images. > > I've read on the Apache Fop page that this was a limitation of Acrobat > because it does not have a built-in postscript interpreter. Postscript > images would not show up in the PDF viewer but would print to a postscript > printer. This was also the case for 20.5. So to get around that, I found > the work around that somebody posted in which you run command line filters, > pdftops, then ps2pdf, and the images would be present (though you would > lose bookmarks in 20.5). So I tried this same approach for 0.91 beta and > it didn't work; my images are still missing. > > I checked the compliance page and did not see anything relating to this. I > did find a thread on the fop-users that didn't seem to be related that > talked about setting content-height and content-width to 'scale-to-fit', so > I tried that also but no luck. Previously, content-height, content-width, > height, and width were all set to auto. > > Here's the <snip> > > <fo:block text-align="center"><fo:block id="serd_fig_tx_term" keep- > together="auto" keep-with-next="auto" space-before.minimum="0.5em" > space-before. optimum="1em" space-before.maximum="2em" > space-after.minimum="0.5em" space-after. optimum="1em" > space-after.maximum="2em"><fo:block font-weight="bold" font- > size="12pt" hyphenate="false" space-after.minimum="0.4em" > space-after.optimum="0. 6em" space-after.maximum="0.8em" > space-before.optimum="1em" space-before.minimum="0. 8em" > space-before.maximum="1.2em" > keep-with-next.within-column="always">Figure  1. SERDES > Transmitter Termination</fo:block><fo:block text-align="center"><fo: > external-graphic src="url(images/serdes-tx-term.eps)" width="auto" > height="auto" > content-width="auto" content-height="auto" > text-align="center"/></fo:block></fo: block></fo:block> > > ****** > > As I stated above, if use this exact same block and use 20.5, then the > filters, my images will appear. If I use 0.91 beta, then the filters, no > images. > > My guess is that since 0.91 beta is more strict with interpretation that it > doesn't like something about this block. However I didn't see anything in > the output with the debug switch on (I might have missed it tho!). > > I'm at a loss. Is it something _really_ obvious? > > Regards, > > Jim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
