Dear Jeremias (or other),
As this is a commercial project I can offer to employ you (or one of the
developers) to cure this problem that we are experiencing.
If you are willing, please let me know your personal charge for completing
the fix.
I can be contacted directly at [EMAIL PROTECTED] if preferable.
Regards,
Ross
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: Keep-Together Problems
At the moment, only "always" is supported for keep values which causes
the effect you've seen. So far nobody has implemented any refinements
that will cause certain keep conditions to be relaxed if necessary as
defined in XSL 1.0, chapter 4.8.
The solution would be to implement finer rules to specify penalty values
during element list generation. Currently, there's no work-around other
than not to use keeps.
On 23.05.2006 16:01:41 Ross Nicholls wrote:
Hi there,
I am currently working on migrating our large XSL-FO project from FOP
v0.20.5 to the new v0.92. Everything is going great and the new version
offers some excellent advantages over the older one, I'm really looking
forward to the SVG and MIF (or similar) output implementations when
they materialise.
I do have one problem however:
The new version (0.92 beta) doesn't seem to cope too well with
Keep-Together on table-rows (or any block level area for that matter)
when the contents are actually larger than a page. In the old version
(0.20.5) I was able to put a keep-together on the table-row which meant
that each "product" from the catalogue would not be split over 2 pages
UNLESS the product was too big to fit on a page of it's own. But with
the new version, when it encounters such a product (table-row, that
contains multiple blocks and image content) it crashes with an error -
something like "Content does not fit in available area after 50
attempts, gave up to avoid an infinite loop".
Unfortunately, this means that we can't go ahead with the upgrade to
the new version of FOP and take advantage of all the wonderful
improvements
- as the keep-togethers are very important.
Does anyone have any idea how I can get round this problem, or is there
a fix available or possible???
I appreciate any help or comments anyone can give.
Kindest Regards,
Ross
Jeremias Maerki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
