Jeremias, Attached is the SVG. The PDF viewer I'm using is Adobe Acrobat (7.something). The quality used to be great with the FOP 0.20.5 bundle. I would assume it is a batik problem, if the batik-1.6-squiggle viewer would not show the rendered SVG in the appropriate quality.
Cheers., -----Original Message----- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 June 2006 09:59 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SVG Font quality The GIF helps showing the symptom but not the reason for the problem. Fonts can generally be rendered in two ways: text operations and vector graphics. In your case, I assume the text was rendered as vector graphics. If "smooth line art" is disabled (or not supported) in your PDF viewer, it could explain the poorer quality. It could help to see your SVG file. But also note that some text elements cannot be painted as text operations, yet. The choice which kind is used depends on the SVG content. On 06.06.2006 13:11:41 Raphael Parree wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed the quality of my fonts in the SVG is noticeably less in 0.92b > than in was with 0.20.5. > > Attached is an example (left is the PDF, right is batik-1.6-squiggle). I am > embedding the fonts (Verdana) in my PDF. > > The SVG is included using defaults (with 72 as the resolution). > > > Any clues? Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
table with generator types.svg
Description: Binary data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
