On 27.06.2006 17:03:18 Arturo Perez wrote: > Perez <arturo <at> ethicist.net> writes: > > > > > In article <BAY102-DAV4F05FF37FD396E2588738FB7E0 <at> phx.gbl>, > > Chris Bowditch <bowditch_chris <at> hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Arturo Perez wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I am concatenating via XSL a bunch of XML files and then trying to set > > > > up references and page numbers for a TOC. But it looks like forward > > > > references aren't working in 0.92 (got that from an old posting). > > > > > > > > -arturo > > > > > OK, I have a workaround. If the page-number-citation refers to an id > on a table-row it does not work. When the id is placed on a block then > it does work. > > I think the page-number-citation is supposed to work in either case? Or > am I wrong about that?
Yes, it's supposed to work, but the implementation is not finished, yet. The limitation is documented here: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-property-id http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/relnotes.html and http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/knownissues.html We appreciate any help in this area. > There's the whole business of "normal area" that > I don't get. What's that about? The term "normal area" is defined in the XSL 1.0 spec in chapter "4.2.5 Stacking Constraints". FOP itself does not maintain the area-class trait in code, however. If there's anything specific I can explain, tell me. Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
