> Hi Gilles, > > If you want that someone reproduce that behaviour, you should provide a > (short) fo file that demonstrate this.
I've already put the fo at the end of this post http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-user&m=115317226805329&w=2 > As a workaround, you can still use a 2 columns fo:table in place of > fo:list-block. Yes, it will work. I just have to check that the header does not disappear in this case. But if possible I prefer to avoid this because I can have 4 levels of lists. Is FOP 0.92 slower with a table structure or with a list structure ? > Pascal > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gilles Beaugeais [mailto:gbeaugeais <at> voila.fr] > > > > Sorry to ask you again but did someone manage to reproduce my > > problem (table header dsappear when table in inside a list) > > with the fo content of the previous post ? > > If yes, is there any workaround keeping the table inside the > > list ? Or will this corrected in a near future ? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Gilles Beaugeais. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
