On Aug 10, 2006, at 20:00, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Vincent,
<snip />
Have a look at section 7.19.1, "break-after" of the recommendation:
"Specifies that the first normal area generated by formatting the
next formatting object, *if any*, shall be the first one placed
in a
particular context (e.g. page-area, column-area)"
That means that if there is no further normal area, then there
should be
no break. That sounds reasonable, after all. So I'm more and more
convinced that that's a bug.
Do you agree?
Yep! *smacks head* Only one place I hadn't looked --the property
definition itself... :P
I was just wondering what the correct output would be if:
...
<!-- content here -->
<fo:block break-after="page" />
<fo:block break-before="page" />
<!-- and content here -->
Empty pages in between? If so, how many?
Later
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
