Agreed, an extension property would be better than fox:destination, but creating a destination for all "id" attributes doesn't sound ideal to me.
On 25.08.2006 16:11:34 Glen Mazza wrote: > I would prefer avoiding the use of fox:destination, as the XSL WG did > not see a need for a separate FO for this when they placed bookmarks > into 1.1. Instead, I think it would be better to implement it the way > the commercial processors handle them, which is I believe is relying > either on the id on the element to be anchored or another property > [1][2][3]. Relying on a property instead of a new FO would probably be > easier/cleaner than introducing fox:destination back to the source code > anyway, as there would be no XSL document validation issues to be > checking for. > > Glen > > [1] http://sourceware.org/ml/docbook-apps/2005-q2/msg00214.html > [2] http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-apps/200602/msg00174.html > [3] http://sourceware.org/ml/docbook-apps/2005-q2/msg00216.html > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > >Indeed, we had fox:destination in FOP 0.20.5 but this has not been > >reimplemented, yet. Contributions are welcome as always. If you need > >pointers, we're always eager to provide those to get you started. > > > >On 24.08.2006 09:59:52 andyrob_24_7 wrote: > > > > > >>Is there a way to achieve destinations in a pdf (so you can link to a > >>certain page), in FOP? > >> > >>It seems this is not yet in 0.92? Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
