Heh. No, I haven't hit the desperation state yet. Okay, thank you for your prompt replies. :)
Evan --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've described possible work-arounds on this list > recently, but they > are only practical if you're more or less desperate. > ;-) > > On 28.08.2006 23:08:52 Evan Goer wrote: > > Oh darn. I see that now, thanks. > > > > Hmmm... is there a workaround for generating x-ref > > page numbers in fop-0.92? Or is everyone who's > using > > x-refs just sticking with fop-0.20? > > > > Evan > > > > > > > > --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > That's a known problem which, so far, nobody > cared > > > to improve. :-( > > > > > > > http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/knownissues.html > > > > > > On 28.08.2006 22:13:35 Evan Goer wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > First, I want to say that I am very happy that > > > > fop-0.92 is moving along. Thanks for moving > > > forward > > > > with this. In general, docs run through the > new > > > FOP > > > > look much nicer -- vertical & horizontal > spacing > > > looks > > > > better, keep-with-next seems to be working > well, > > > etc. > > > > This is great! > > > > > > > > Recently I've run into a strange issue with > > > > <fo:page-number-citation> -- it works fine > with > > > > fop-0.20, but the output is incorrect in > fop-0.92. > > > > Here's a snippet that illustrates the problem. > > > > Originally this FO came from running Docbook > > > through > > > > FOP, with the option to generate page numbers > for > > > > links turned on. I've tried to remove most of > the > > > > Docbook cruft, but I know almost nothing about > FO, > > > so > > > > please bear with me. :) > > > > > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> > > > > <fo:root > > > xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format";> > > > > <fo:layout-master-set> > > > > <fo:simple-page-master > > > > master-name="body-first" page-width="8.5in" > > > > page-height="11in" > > > > margin-top="0.5in" > > > margin-bottom="0.5in" > > > > margin-left="1in - 0pt" margin-right="1in"> > > > > <fo:region-body > margin-bottom="0.5in" > > > > margin-top="0.5in" column-gap="12pt" > > > > column-count="1"/> > > > > </fo:simple-page-master> > > > > <fo:page-sequence-master > > > master-name="body"> > > > > > > > <fo:repeatable-page-master-alternatives> > > > > > > > <fo:conditional-page-master-reference > > > > master-reference="body-first" > > > > page-position="first"/> > > > > > > > </fo:repeatable-page-master-alternatives> > > > > </fo:page-sequence-master> > > > > </fo:layout-master-set> > > > > <fo:page-sequence master-reference="body"> > > > > <fo:flow flow-name="xsl-region-body"> > > > > <fo:block id="thispara">This is a > > > > <fo:basic-link > > > > > > > > > > internal-destination="thispara">link</fo:basic-link><fo:basic-link > > > > internal-destination="thispara"> > > > > [<fo:page-number-citation > > > > ref-id="thispara"/>]</fo:basic-link> that goes > to > > > this > > > > very paragraph.</fo:block> > > > > </fo:flow> > > > > </fo:page-sequence> > > > > </fo:root> > > > > > > > > If you run this through fop-0.20, you get > > > > > > > > This is a link [1] that goes to this very > > > paragraph. > > > > > > > > If you run this through fop-0.92, you get > > > > > > > > This is a link [1] that goes to this > very > > > > paragraph. > > > > > > > > Any thoughts about what's going on? (Note: The > > > problem > > > > becomes worse if the page number is two > digits, > > > > because the "]" starts to overlay the second > > > digit. I > > > > can provide screenshots of that, if necessary, > but > > > I > > > > think the snippet above points out that > > > *something* > > > > weird is going on.) > > > > > > > > Thanks for taking a look, > > > > > > > > Evan > > > > > > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
